When the bible was written humans* didn’t know: About bacteria and viruses and parasites Blood circulation Earth going around sun More than 5 planets About galaxies There was a southern hemisphere Earth round What lightning is That whales aren’t fish What mental illness involves About genes and inheritance About Chinese, Aztecs, Zulus, Aborigines, Navaho, Japanese, [...]
Posts Tagged ‘richard dawkins’
To be hanged with the bible
Posted in Atheism, politics, tagged Climate Change, science, religion, Evolution, health, Atheism, tony abbott, australia, media, richard dawkins, law, steve fielding, creationism, history, America on February 12, 2012 | 53 Comments »
Kissing Cousins
Posted in Evolution, tagged creationism, Evolution, history, richard dawkins, science on January 23, 2012 | 7 Comments »
[Note this was written to follow on from discussions which began in comments on post "When you wish" below and continued into those of "Extraordinary". One of my most regular commenters on this blog, Eric, is trying to understand evolution. I, we, are trying to help him. This post arose from Eric's comment that "I [...]
Never on a Sunday
Posted in Atheism, tagged Atheism, creationism, education, history, infrastructure, religion, richard dawkins, science on September 2, 2011 | 12 Comments »
The big advantage of having an atheist prime minister is that she can give the country seven days a week hard work instead of spending Sundays in the company of imaginary beings and people who believe in imaginary beings. You get 14% more work out of an atheist prime minister than a god-botherer. But in [...]
Peter Principle
Posted in Atheism, tagged Atheism, australia, Climate Change, creationism, environment, Evolution, global warming, religion, richard dawkins, science, steve fielding, tony abbott on April 30, 2011 | 4 Comments »
This post was inspired by this latest piece of offensive nonsense from Australia’s Pope-in-waiting, the awe-full Cardinal P-ll. It compares the pathways to the top of their professions followed by scientists and religious leaders. To get promotion Religious leaders – on the way up show absolute willingness to obey, follow, believe, totally accept authority. Are [...]
If ever I was foxed it was now
Posted in Atheism, tagged Atheism, atheists in foxholes, beliefs, health, PZ Myers, religion, richard dawkins, science, superstition on April 11, 2011 | 5 Comments »
Yet again the tired old phrase “There are no atheists in foxholes”, raises its tired old head and looks around the battlefield and concludes it is the killer blow by the tired old religious army. Once more over the top, hunting bugle blowing, and the atheists will be put to flight, vanquished at last. PZ [...]
The evolution of chocolate
Posted in Evolution, Media, tagged America, australia, charles darwin, creationism, education, Evolution, media, religion, richard dawkins, science on March 31, 2011 | 4 Comments »
There used to be, and still may be, a computer facility that allows you to program particular function keys on the keyboard to produce a whole phrase with one keystroke. Particularly useful for politicians (“there is only one poll that matters”, “I can’t comment on this because it is now the subject of legal proceedings”, [...]
‘Noble Atheist’ Seeks Paris Trip
Posted in Atheism, tagged Atheism, religion, richard dawkins on June 9, 2010 | Leave a Comment »
though give up my freedom of thought, nah, don’t think Paris is worth a Mass
Foxhole for atheists
Posted in Atheism, tagged Atheism, global atheist convention, richard dawkins on October 13, 2009 | 1 Comment »
Well, at last I am all booked in for The 2010 Global Atheist Convention in Melbourne, Australia, March 12 – 14, 2010. They had, amazingly, already sold out of gold passes, so you had better get in quick. I hope many of my readers will see me there, oh, as well as checking out Dawkins [...]
Not in Kansas
Posted in Atheism, tagged creationism, Evolution, oklahoma, richard dawkins on March 26, 2009 | 90 Comments »
Someone more convinced than I that from May 1859, the origin of the Origin of Species, it was impossible for an intelligent person to be religious? I think not



