Would you believe…

6

See, there are people who believe… I’m sorry, you’ll laugh. There are people who believe that the money that tobacco companies used in advertising, promotion, sponsorship, to make their brand logos well-known, in order to make huge profits (including of course recovering as costs or tax deductions the money spent on promotion), is much more important to society than the vastly bigger amounts of money the public have to spend to deal with the costs of tobacco addiction.

Want to believe two impossible things before breakfast? Well, try this one. There are people who believe that the money made by energy companies digging and drilling fossil fuels out of ground, the enormous profits to be made from a substance which costs little to extract per unit but which can be sold at a price manipulated by the sellers, must never be impeded in any way by regulation, must pay as little in the way of tax to the countries in which the fuels by prehistoric chance are found, and the companies must never be encouraged to switch to renewable energy development, and that all of these aims must be strenuously lobbied for in the most dishonest ways, because of their libertarian beliefs, even though the continued use of the fossil fuels is destroying the very planet on which the people doing the lobbying (and indeed the employees of the energy companies) live, the pure application of free market economics is the most important thing on the world.

Phew, bit of a mouthful, eh? Still, we haven’t finished yet, want to try for three impossible things before lunch? You sure? Might spoil your appetite? Oh, ok then. There are people who purport to be acting in matters such as tobacco and fossil fuels, out of pure disinterested, bright-eyed belief in libertarian neoconservative free market drown-the-government-in-the-bathtub principles – “we are from a right-wing think tank and we are here to help” – who, wait for it, wait for it, are actually funded by tobacco and energy companies to push the line that such companies must be left unhindered by the invisible hand of public interest.

I know, I know, toughest one yet, eh? I mean, you see the problem, don’t you? Coincidence is one thing, but this is unbelievable coincidence. Here is this little band of zealots, happy spreading the Gospel according to Freddy, the Sayings of Ayn, so devoted to the cause, the well-being of human-kind that they would happily give up all worldly possessions, dress in sackcloth, live in a cave in the mountains, eat only locusts (perhaps with the luxury of an occasional skinny desert mouse roasted on a spit), sacrifice all worldly ambitions just to preach on the road to Damascus in the hope of making the occasional convert. And yet, by pure chance, here are tobacco and energy companies, willing to make an occasional small donation so that these prophets can be supported in a little comfort in, say, a modest Melbourne suburban house, eating takeaway meals, and wearing cheap suits and blue ties.

Where is the coincidence, you ask? Well, you’ll hardly credit it, but do you know, it just so happened that immediately after the energy and tobacco companies donate a pittance to help the Rand fanbois, those same fanbois, in a move of course planned years earlier, began to push issues such as the demand that cigarette plain-packaging laws be removed, and that a price on carbon, together with the development of wind and solar power, be abandoned. I know, there would have been a lot of chuckling among both fanbois and corporations about what an astonishingly favourable coincidence it was. What? You are questioning the coincidence? You cynic – just as a million monkeys on a million typewriters wrote “Atlas Shrugged” in 24 hours, so the infinite size of the universe can easily allow libertarian zealots to stop action on climate change totally independently of the irrelevant funding by energy companies. So there.

And now, want to try believing in a fourth impossible thing before dinner? Of course you do. I bet you were thinking to yourself, as you read the preceding, oh, those poor Blue-tied Hayek-clones, laughing stocks of the community, why, they’d have to go out wearing Maynard Keynes Masks for disguise, to avoid people pointing and sneering and small boys throwing rotten eggs and tomatoes, couldn’t do anything except huddle in their office bunker like a fringe fundamentalist group about to flee to Guyana as soon as the black helicopters stopped circling overhead.

Fooled you twice I’m afraid, shame on me. These Fundamentalist Friedmanites, far from being laughing stocks (or indeed in stocks) are treated as serious economic, social, cultural, environmental commentators by the Australian media – appear on all tv and radio networks, write columns for major newspapers, have regular slots on all ABC current affairs programs; and by the Liberal Party of Australia whose leader makes speeches to them and happily adopts their lunatic policies to save time developing his own when he could be dressed in fluoro vest and hard hat performing stunts for tv cameras.

Sorry, pushed my luck there, that was just one too many impossible things to believe, right?

6 comments on “Would you believe…

  1. Boohoo says:

    Ha, beautifully written. Made my day.

    Like

  2. Rather spoiled mine, I must be missing something – hope, perhaps?

    Like

  3. Geoff Andrews says:

    …but wait, there’s more.
    It’s impossible to believe that the Labor caucus was so intimidated by the mining lobby’s campaign against Rudd’s proposed super profits tax; so inept at communicating to the public that all we/they were asking for was a fair suck of the sauce bottle from companies that don’t even have to pay upfront for the product (our product) that they were selling at record prices, that they were willing to sacrifice Rudd’s tiger for a purry liddle puttycat who then sets up a mechanism to simultaneously minimise the tax they were trying to introduce and allow the mining states to drain the Commonwealth coffers at will.
    In a 45 second ad, SOMEONE should have been able to explain to us with mellifluous accent and perfect grammar that, based on the previous year’s financial report. Company X had sales of $S million dollars, they received $T million tax concessions and after all expenses, declared a nett profit after tax of $P million, from which the people of Australia would receive $R million under the proposed law.
    I find it impossible to believe that SOMEONE in caucus (or, gasp, the cabinet) didn’t think to suggest to Swann that “promising” a surplus two years in advance was like the weather bureau guaranteeing that Xmas Day 2015 will be fine.
    Some people would probably scoff in disbelief at the idea that a mainstream political party would see a minor party closest to them philosophically and on whom they relied to remain in power, as the enemy.

    Like

  4. Alan Phillips says:

    I believe every word of it! Democracy? What a joke!

    Like

  5. fred says:

    http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/2013/07/18/new-study-of-foragers-undermines-claim-that-war-has-deep-evolutionary-roots/

    David
    You may be interested in this link, it mentions my favourite movie -”2001- A Space Odyssey”.

    “One of the most insidious modern memes holds that war is innate, an adaptation bred into our ancestors by natural selection….
    The study’s authors, anthropologists Douglas Fry and Patrik Soderberg of Abo Akademi University in Finland, say their findings “contradict recent assertions that [mobile foragers] regularly engage in coalitionary war against other groups.”

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s