Nothing to write home about?


Have been watching a series of Alan Bennett plays on DVD (“Alan Bennett at the BBC”).

I’ve always felt kindly disposed towards Bennett. He seems like a nice fellow from his books, and I suppose his experiences, ideas, personality, are something like mine might have been had my family stayed in northern England and I been born there instead of in Australia. Or perhaps not.

Have always thought of his plays as being great works in some sense. The stage and tv equivalent of the 1950s-1960s working class English novels I admired when young. Had only seen a few of them, and settled back to watch the whole sequence with great expectations.

Only to suffer a right disappointment.

Look, don’t get me wrong. His excellent qualities are on full display here. He’s had a lifetime of using ears finely attuned to words and tone of voice; of eyes finely focused on facial expression and body movements; of empathetic neurones able to imagine himself in all kinds of other pairs of shoes. It is as if you are there with him on the top of the bus looking down on the street, or at the seaside on holiday, or in a hotel, remarking on the passing human parade.

But, and I’m afraid it’s a big BUT, seeing them all at once like this reveals them to be very thin gruel indeed. Great plays, like great novels, poems, films, need to do more than just present a slice of finely observed life. They need to show us something, teach us something about the meaning of life that is more than just “41”. There need to be deep and meaningful ideas about the meaning of life that arise from the fine observations, the latter, for an artist, never being an end in themselves.

What do we get from Alan, one play at a time? The First World War killed a lot of people who had been living in a Golden Age; retirement is a challenge after a working life; a spiteful person can wreck your life; an unpleasant person who thinks they are popular often isn’t; a disabled child can put strain on a marriage; Guy Burgess loved Englishness; Franz Kafka got his ideas from his place of employment; Marcel Proust was isolated by his housekeeper; discovering Anthony Blunt was a spy was like working on a painting. And so on, so little. Each of those is the only “insight”, from all those plays, one per play, about either life in general or some historical figure. And the latter unconvincing. Slim pickings eh?

My idea of a good play is not just the company of clever, well-informed people, who have a great deal of conversation; but one which will tell me a number of things about life, the universe, and everything that I hadn’t thought of before.

But I guess I am mistaken, it seems that is not a good play, that is the best. And Alan Bennett’s plays, sadly, are merely good.

About these ads

3 comments on “Nothing to write home about?

  1. Mindy says:

    Ahh, that’s where he went wrong then. Douglas Adams said the meaning of life is 42.


  2. Geoff Andrews says:

    Maybe you’re being a bit harsh on poor old Mr Bennett, David?
    One might experience the same disappointment as yours if one watched a string of David Williamson’s plays or Oscar Wilde’s. I imagine his “Talking Heads” series might be hard to take at a single sitting.
    His basic (and original) skill, as you are undoubtedly aware, is as a comedy writer (“Beyond the Fringe” and Dud & Pete).
    By the way, (or should I show how post modern I am: BTW), why does the equation
    2 x 21 = 42 have anything to do with the meaning of life?
    An elephant stamp as Phillip Adams would say, for the first correct or original answer.


    • David Horton says:

      Well, I would certainly say the same about the grossly over-rated Williamson. Possibly Wilde too – in both cases not, say, 30 plays, but one play 30 times. As Phillip Adams might say. One of the Bennett series is from the Talking Heads – the awful woman who thinks she is valued and eventually dies alone. Nicely, wickedly observed, no doubt, but in the end signifying little.

      And “42” what a good question about a good answer! I’d always assumed a number chosen at random, but I assume you know not. Is it to do with prime numbers, perhps?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s