The Three and a Half


The Canberra Press Gallery has always been, necessarily, close to its subjects of study. Not a unique situation perhaps, if we think of, say, the worlds of Music, Sport, Art, Agriculture, Finance, but very different from those of say Science, Medicine, Law.

In recent times the linkages, the shared workplace, the chumminess, the personal partnerships, the commonality of interests, the sense of being not observed and objective observer but politicomedia gang members, seems much greater than ever before.

The proprietors of the media have moved to the Right and taken their staff with them. As a result, these days journalists have a much closer sense of common beliefs, goals, tactics, teamwork, with the conservative parties of the Coalition and the more conservative members of the government. Which in turn has led to even more team bonding and confusion of roles.

The Press Gallery now see themselves not as objective, arms length reporters of their subjects and subject matter, but, rather like those embedded with army units, as part of the regiment. Sharing objectives, helping their team defeat the enemy (the government), capture the Hill, plant the Conservative flag firmly on the House flagpole.

Conversely the politicians see their role more as a media one – packaging press releases, delivering sound bites, performing photogenic stunts. At best these things are content-free, most are partial or total lies, at worst they are vicious smears. They are not designed to withstand any kind of rational analysis, they are designed to provide a tv news image, a radio shock jock talking point, a tabloid headline.

They will receive no rational analysis. Because journalists and politicians are so close, working together, socialising together, eating meals together, perhaps on occasion sleeping together, the fodder of the press event seems completely unremarkable to journalists. They will consist of words, phrases, sneers they will have heard, may indeed have contributed to, in a hundred late night conversations in rooms, corridors, restaurants, bars, as they socialised with their friends. It would be no more appropriate to analyse, dissect, criticise, such conversations, than it would be to do that to discussions with family and friends.

Having sleep-walked into this tender trap the journalists, being professionals, would surely welcome wake-up calls from outside observers, consumers of the media? Well, if you think that your knowledge of human nature is a little lacking. Just as criticism of, say, the behaviour of a policeman has the police cars forming a protective circle, so do journalists protect their brothers and sisters from the non-professionals. Indeed, criticism of the politicians, also their brothers and sisters-arms, will be treated in the same way.

But really, how could there BE criticism? Only the journalists are privy to the late night gossip sessions, only they know where the bodies are buried, where others will be buried. Only they know the buzz, the vibe, the context. There are no other stories, hell, there are no other ways of presenting the stories. Media and politicians are in perfect agreement as to what the narrative-du-jour will be, and how it will be sold to the world outside the politicomedia one. The journalists, hearing and reading criticism from, say, the upstart social media, are probably genuinely puzzled, indeed hurt, that they could be so misjudged for simply doing their job of repeating the indisputable. And seek ever more eagerly the warm embrace of their crowd of insiders.

Fourth Estate? Three and a Half Estate.

About these ads

12 comments on “The Three and a Half

  1. David Donovan says:

    Nice one!

    David Donovan | Managing Editor

    Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: cid:image003.jpg@01CC1417.504479D0

    ‘The journal of democracy and independent thought’

    PO Box 260, Isle of Capri, Qld, 4217 Mobile: +61 403 237 880 | Fax: +61 7 5526 8217 Email: | Website:

    Twitter: | Facebook:


  2. Keith Woolsey says:

    24 hour news cycle has something to do with this and journos justifying their existence in an electronic world. Nowadays you buy newspapers for the laughs. The Weekend Australian is a hoot. Even good ol’ Auntie has been infected.


  3. Geoff Andrews says:

    But Mark Scott’s even handed approach has kept the ABC biased to the left, thus balancing all the slightly right-of-centre leanings that might have crept into the commercial newspapers, TV and radio.
    I mean, Kerry (the commo) O’Brien, Phillip Adams, that pair that host the 7.30 Report that give 10 minutes of air time to Mr Abbott in the hope he might have a “gotcha” moment … I could name at least another two if I had the space. All evidence of ABC bias.


  4. Buff McMenis says:

    Scary, isn’t it? Thank all the gods, wherever and whenever and whoever they are, for the 5th Estate! The Blogosphere! We get truth, thought, discussion, and mostly balanced discussions and opinions.


  5. Trev says:

    When first elected, the Federal government had an opportunity to bring ABC management back to its previous independent state but chose to do nothing. Why?

    In contrast, the incoming Howard government had no qualms about infecting the ABC with very much right-of-centre management. No need to ask why.


    • ron docherty says:

      It!s about time JJulia corrected that


    • Geoff Andrews says:

      Several possible answers, Trev.

      1. They never expected to win the 2007 election, so after 10 glorious years of exhilarating factional scrapping when they hated each other more than they hated Howard, they were caught unaware when executive decisions suddenly had to be made so they simply asked themselves “What would Howard do?”. They have since applied this technique successfully to asylum seekers, budget surpluses and, until recently, same sex marriage and poker machine reform; or

      2. they hate Kerry (“the commie”) O’Brien and it was their way of getting square; or

      3. they’d become addicted to scoring own goals in opposition and couldn’t kick the habit (if you’ll excuse the tautology). Note that they’ve kicked a few since then too, the best one being the cunning undertaking to recompense mining companies who get hit with extra State government royalties. Their perception that the Greens and other balancers of power on which their survival depends are like turds that won’t flush should be considered as an unsuccessful attempt at an own goal that hit the crossbar; or

      4. Mark Scott told them he’d voted for them.

      Have I told you my latest conspiracy theory?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s